diff --git a/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_driver/recovery_scan.rs b/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_driver/recovery_scan.rs
index f42df38e3..13e7d63a6 100644
--- a/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_driver/recovery_scan.rs
+++ b/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_driver/recovery_scan.rs
@@ -891,12 +891,19 @@ pub(in crate::agent) fn resume_game_creator_agent_background_tasks_unredacted_at
     validate_project_root(root)?;
     // 这是一条只覆盖策划根 Supervisor 的窄投影恢复，却挂在整轮 resume 的最前面。
     // 原来用 `?` 强传播：一次 Fast GDD 投影失败会掐掉全项目所有 Agent 的恢复——而它
-    // 本身正是 receipt 投影失败后的重试入口，掐掉它等于连兜底一起废掉。改成把
-    // fail-closed 精确收敛到受影响的那个 run，其余 Agent 照常恢复；实在无法归属时
-    // 才退回原来的全局上抛。
+    // 本身正是 receipt 投影失败后的重试入口，掐掉它等于连兜底一起废掉。
+    //
+    // 失败必须分三路，不能两路。此前把「瞬时」和「归属不了」并成同一个 false，
+    // 结果瞬时锁争用走了全局上抛，让这条可反复调用的恢复入口整轮失败——而锁被占
+    // 恰恰说明别处正在推进，是最不该失败的时候。
     if let Err(error) = reconcile_plan_gdd_approval_projections_at(root) {
         let error = format!("恢复 GDD approval 投影失败：{error}");
-        if !contain_plan_gdd_approval_recovery_failure_at(root, &error)? {
+        if static_delegate_parent_wake_error_is_transient(&error) {
+            // 瞬时争用（最常见的是 `.agent/project.lock` 正被另一个写操作占用）：
+            // 跳过本轮投影恢复，其余恢复照常走，下一轮 resume 重试。与下面拿不到
+            // runtime task 锁时直接跳过的处理是同一套语义，因此同样不落审计。
+        } else if !contain_plan_gdd_approval_recovery_failure_at(root, &error)? {
+            // 持久失败但归属不到具体 run：只能退回原来的全局上抛。
             return Err(error);
         }
     }
@@ -2001,12 +2008,11 @@ mod plan_gdd_approval_wait_recovery_tests {
 
         let held = acquire_project_write_lock(root, "test.hold-project-write-lock")
             .expect("hold the project write lock");
-        let error = resume_game_creator_agent_background_tasks_at(root)
-            .expect_err("锁争用属于瞬时错误，必须照旧上抛而不是就地收敛");
-        assert!(
-            error.contains("恢复 GDD approval 投影失败"),
-            "unexpected error: {error}"
-        );
+        // 锁被占说明别处正在推进，这恰恰是 resume 最不该失败的时候：本轮跳过投影
+        // 恢复即可，整轮 resume 必须照常成功。上抛会让 resume 这个可反复调用的恢复
+        // 入口在一次普通锁争用下整体失败——真实调用方就是连着调它来断言幂等的。
+        resume_game_creator_agent_background_tasks_at(root)
+            .expect("瞬时锁争用只能跳过本轮投影恢复，不得让整轮 resume 失败");
         drop(held);
 
         let contained = read_game_creator_agent_runtime_at(root, &runtime.agent_id)
diff --git a/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_protocol/planning_storage.rs b/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_protocol/planning_storage.rs
index 3d4d55378..29f3d1b99 100644
--- a/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_protocol/planning_storage.rs
+++ b/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_protocol/planning_storage.rs
@@ -2913,8 +2913,10 @@ pub(crate) fn validate_plan_gdd_index_against_gdds_and_approvals(
 }
 
 fn approval_directory_is_present(root: &Path) -> Result<bool, PlanningStorageError> {
-    let path = resolve_local_project_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_DIR)
-        .map_err(|error| PlanningStorageError::new("PLAN_INVALID_PATH", error))?;
+    let path = resolve_planning_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_DIR)?;
+    // 下面这次 stat 仍然必要：`resolve_planning_path` 只保证解析那一刻整条链
+    // 可信，而判定「目录存在」要读的是使用时刻的那一项，顺带还要排掉链接以外
+    // 的另一种不可信形态——普通文件占位。
     match fs::symlink_metadata(path) {
         Ok(metadata) => {
             if planning_metadata_is_link_or_reparse(&metadata) || !metadata.is_dir() {
@@ -3166,8 +3168,7 @@ pub(crate) fn read_plan_gdd_approvals(
 pub(crate) fn read_plan_gdd_approvals_locked(
     root: &Path,
 ) -> Result<Vec<PlanGddApprovalV1>, PlanningStorageError> {
-    let approvals_root = resolve_local_project_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_DIR)
-        .map_err(|error| PlanningStorageError::new("PLAN_INVALID_PATH", error))?;
+    let approvals_root = resolve_planning_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_DIR)?;
     let metadata = match fs::symlink_metadata(&approvals_root) {
         Ok(metadata) => metadata,
         Err(error) if error.kind() == std::io::ErrorKind::NotFound => return Ok(Vec::new()),
@@ -3228,8 +3229,7 @@ pub(crate) fn read_plan_gdd_approval_for_version_locked(
         return Err(invalid("approval receipt version 越界"));
     }
     let relative = format!("{PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_DIR}/v{version}.json");
-    let path = resolve_local_project_path(root, &relative)
-        .map_err(|error| PlanningStorageError::new("PLAN_INVALID_PATH", error))?;
+    let path = resolve_planning_path(root, &relative)?;
     match fs::symlink_metadata(&path) {
         Ok(_) => {
             let bytes =
@@ -4032,8 +4032,7 @@ pub(crate) fn read_plan_gdd_approval_pending(
 pub(crate) fn read_plan_gdd_approval_pending_locked(
     root: &Path,
 ) -> Result<Option<PlanGddApprovalPendingV1>, PlanningStorageError> {
-    let path = resolve_local_project_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_PENDING_PATH)
-        .map_err(|error| PlanningStorageError::new("PLAN_INVALID_PATH", error))?;
+    let path = resolve_planning_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_PENDING_PATH)?;
     match fs::symlink_metadata(&path) {
         Ok(_) => {
             let bytes = read_regular_planning_file(&path, "GDD approval pending")?;
@@ -4061,8 +4060,7 @@ pub(crate) fn write_plan_gdd_approval_pending_atomic_locked(
     value: &PlanGddApprovalPendingV1,
 ) -> Result<(), PlanningStorageError> {
     let bytes = canonical_plan_gdd_approval_pending_bytes(value)?;
-    let target = resolve_local_project_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_PENDING_PATH)
-        .map_err(|error| PlanningStorageError::new("PLAN_INVALID_PATH", error))?;
+    let target = resolve_planning_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_PENDING_PATH)?;
     let parent = ensure_planning_parent(&target)?;
     if let Ok(_) = fs::symlink_metadata(&target) {
         verify_regular_planning_file(&target, "现有 GDD approval pending")?;
@@ -4094,8 +4092,7 @@ pub(crate) fn write_plan_gdd_approval_pending_atomic_locked(
 pub(crate) fn remove_plan_gdd_approval_pending_locked(
     root: &Path,
 ) -> Result<(), PlanningStorageError> {
-    let path = resolve_local_project_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_PENDING_PATH)
-        .map_err(|error| PlanningStorageError::new("PLAN_INVALID_PATH", error))?;
+    let path = resolve_planning_path(root, PLAN_GDD_APPROVAL_PENDING_PATH)?;
     match fs::symlink_metadata(&path) {
         Ok(_) => {
             verify_regular_planning_file(&path, "GDD approval pending")?;
@@ -5331,4 +5328,76 @@ mod tests {
             "PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH"
         );
     }
+
+    /// M1C-1 新增的审批路径最初绕过 `resolve_planning_path`，直接用通用解析器。
+    /// 通用解析器只认 `is_symlink()`，把结果一律映射成 `PLAN_INVALID_PATH`；而
+    /// 规划解析器认的是 `FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT` 全量重解析标记，并把被
+    /// 篡改的路径如实报成 `PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH`。审批回执正是 GDD 完成门的判据，
+    /// 它的路径分类必须和 GDD/session 一致，否则调用方按错误码分流时会把「路径
+    /// 不可信」当成「路径写错了」。
+    #[cfg(any(unix, windows))]
+    #[test]
+    fn approval_paths_classify_a_linked_planning_root_as_untrusted_not_merely_invalid() {
+        let directory = tempfile::tempdir().expect("temp root");
+        let root = directory.path();
+        // 旁路目录留在项目内：真正要挡的是「planning 根被指向别处」，不是「逃出根」。
+        let decoy = root.join("decoy-planning");
+        fs::create_dir_all(decoy.join("approvals")).expect("decoy approvals");
+        fs::create_dir_all(root.join(".agent")).expect("agent dir");
+        let planning_link = {
+            let mut path = root.to_path_buf();
+            for part in PLAN_STORAGE_ROOT.split('/') {
+                path.push(part);
+            }
+            path
+        };
+        #[cfg(unix)]
+        std::os::unix::fs::symlink(&decoy, &planning_link).expect("planning symlink");
+        // 用 junction 而不是 `symlink_dir`：后者要开发者模式/管理员权限，普通开发
+        // 机上建不起来，用例会静默跳过成永远通过的空壳；junction 无需提权，而且它
+        // 正是本仓各处点名要挡的那种 Windows 重解析点。
+        #[cfg(windows)]
+        {
+            use std::os::windows::process::CommandExt;
+            let status = std::process::Command::new("cmd")
+                .arg("/C")
+                .raw_arg(format!(
+                    "mklink /J \"{}\" \"{}\"",
+                    planning_link.display(),
+                    decoy.display()
+                ))
+                .status()
+                .expect("spawn mklink");
+            assert!(status.success(), "junction 建不起来则本用例失去判据");
+        }
+
+        // 写入路径不在列：它的父链早已由 `ensure_planning_parent` 逐段校验，
+        // 本来就会报 PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH，不构成这次改动的判据。
+        assert_eq!(
+            approval_directory_is_present(root).unwrap_err().code(),
+            "PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH"
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            read_plan_gdd_approvals_locked(root).unwrap_err().code(),
+            "PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH"
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            read_plan_gdd_approval_for_version_locked(root, 1)
+                .unwrap_err()
+                .code(),
+            "PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH"
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            read_plan_gdd_approval_pending_locked(root)
+                .unwrap_err()
+                .code(),
+            "PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH"
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            remove_plan_gdd_approval_pending_locked(root)
+                .unwrap_err()
+                .code(),
+            "PLAN_UNTRUSTED_PATH"
+        );
+    }
 }
diff --git a/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_tools/delivery.rs b/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_tools/delivery.rs
index 603a0128d..1a63dcad1 100644
--- a/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_tools/delivery.rs
+++ b/apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/agent/runtime_tools/delivery.rs
@@ -315,6 +315,14 @@ pub(in crate::agent) fn wake_waiting_static_delegate_parent_run_at(
     if barrier.has_waiting() {
         return Ok(false);
     }
+    // 用户修订是一条显式的 Supervisor 决策边界：在它派出续作之前，父 run 绝不能
+    // 被自动恢复。这条语义由 `has_waiting()` 承担（它把 userRevisionPending 计入
+    // 等待），所以上面那道门已经覆盖。断言把这份跨文件依赖钉在使用现场——若哪天
+    // `has_waiting()` 不再计入该计数，这里会立刻炸而不是静默跨过决策边界。
+    debug_assert_eq!(
+        barrier.user_revision_pending_count, 0,
+        "userRevisionPending 必须已被 has_waiting() 拦下，否则父 run 会越过用户修订边界自动恢复"
+    );
     let state = read_game_creator_agent_runtime_for_session_at(
         root,
         &current_task.agent_id,
@@ -337,11 +345,6 @@ pub(in crate::agent) fn wake_waiting_static_delegate_parent_run_at(
         ensure_static_delegate_user_input_wait_at(root, &mut state, &deliveries)?;
         return Ok(true);
     }
-    if barrier.user_revision_pending_count > 0 {
-        // A user revision is an explicit Supervisor decision boundary.  Do
-        // not auto-resume the parent before it dispatches the continuation.
-        return Ok(false);
-    }
     let state = advance_game_creator_agent_runtime_turn_at(
         root,
         state,