清理旧策划修订写入入口并记录认证契约冲突

删除无生产调用的用户修订写入函数，保留持久记录兼容与门禁
调整原有门禁测试的历史记录夹具，保持行为断言
将 OAuth 契约冲突与关闭条件记录到 AGC 主方案
警告清单仅保留 AuthBridge 暂缓状态及主方案链接

apps/ai-game-creator-shell/src-tauri/src/delegation.rs

@@ -532,19 +532,10 @@ pub(crate) fn mark_static_delegate_delivery_ready_with_result_at(
 /// claim 里的 `structuredResult` 是「父 Agent 在那个 action 上观察到了什么」的冻结
 /// 快照；delivery 是当前真相。两者绝大多数时候必须逐字相等——不等就是漂移或篡改。
 ///
-/// 唯一的例外是审批：用户在审批卡上点「修改 / 退回」后，
-/// `mark_static_delegate_delivery_user_revision_requested_at` 会把 delivery 从
-/// `EvidenceReady` 原地改写成 `UserRevisionRequested`，而 claim 快照仍停在
-/// `EvidenceReady`。那不是漂移，是一次只由审批产生、且只能朝这个方向走的合法转移；
-/// 快照记的那句「当时观察到 evidence-ready」现在依然为真，不该被改写。
-///
-/// 按全等判会把它当成冲突：`agent.run_status` 每次重放这条 claim 都 failed，
-/// Supervisor 永远拿不到回执、也就永远建不出修订委派。生产实测卡死在第 43 轮空转，
-/// 报「静态委派 claim 与 delivery 身份或结果冲突」。原型没有 claim 这层快照，单一
-/// 真相就地改，结构上不存在这个冲突——这里翻译的是同一个语义：比较的是「delivery 是
-/// 不是 receipt 的合法后继」，不是「两者永远全等」。
-///
-/// 放行面刻意压到最小：除 `contractStatus` 外每个字段都必须逐字不变，且方向唯一。
+/// 兼容旧策划审批留下的持久记录：delivery 已从 `EvidenceReady` 转为
+/// `UserRevisionRequested`，claim 仍保存当时观察到的 `EvidenceReady`。
+/// 旧审批写入入口已退役，这里只识别存量记录的合法后继，不要求恢复旧写入链。
+/// 除 `contractStatus` 外每个字段都必须逐字不变，且仅允许上述单向转移。
 fn static_delegate_structured_result_follows_claim_snapshot(
     snapshot: Option<&StaticDelegateStructuredResult>,
     current: Option<&StaticDelegateStructuredResult>,
@@ -565,42 +556,6 @@ fn static_delegate_structured_result_follows_claim_snapshot(
     rebased == *snapshot
 }
 
-/// Mark an already claimed, evidence-ready planning delivery as waiting for a
-/// user-requested revision.  Approval is the only producer of this durable
-/// status; keeping the transition here makes its evidence precondition and
-/// idempotency explicit instead of allowing a generic delivery writer to
-/// manufacture the state.
-pub(crate) fn mark_static_delegate_delivery_user_revision_requested_at(
-    root: &Path,
-    parent_agent_id: &str,
-    parent_run_id: &str,
-    delegation_id: &str,
-) -> Result<StaticDelegateDeliveryRecord, String> {
-    validate_static_delegate_id(parent_agent_id, "parentAgentId", 96)?;
-    validate_static_delegate_id(parent_run_id, "parentRunId", 160)?;
-    validate_static_delegate_id(delegation_id, "delegationId", 160)?;
-    let mut delivery = read_static_delegate_delivery_at(root, delegation_id)?
-        .ok_or_else(|| format!("静态委派 delivery 不存在：{delegation_id}"))?;
-    if delivery.parent_agent_id != parent_agent_id || delivery.parent_run_id != parent_run_id {
-        return Err("用户修订只能改写同一 Supervisor 父 run 的 delivery".to_string());
-    }
-    if delivery.status != StaticDelegateDeliveryStatus::ClaimedByParent {
-        return Err("用户修订只能改写已由 Supervisor 认领的 delivery".to_string());
-    }
-    let Some(result) = delivery.structured_result.as_mut() else {
-        return Err("用户修订的原 delivery 缺少 structuredResult".to_string());
-    };
-    match result.contract_status {
-        StaticDelegateContractStatus::UserRevisionRequested => return Ok(delivery),
-        StaticDelegateContractStatus::EvidenceReady => {}
-        _ => return Err("用户修订只能从 EvidenceReady delivery 派生".to_string()),
-    }
-    result.contract_status = StaticDelegateContractStatus::UserRevisionRequested;
-    delivery.updated_at = unix_timestamp();
-    write_static_delegate_delivery_at(root, &delivery)?;
-    Ok(delivery)
-}
-
 pub(crate) fn suppress_static_delegate_delivery_at(
     root: &Path,
     expected: &StaticDelegateDeliveryRecord,
@@ -3297,16 +3252,10 @@ mod tests {
             parent_run_id,
             "m1c1-user-revision-barrier-first",
             None,
-            StaticDelegateContractStatus::EvidenceReady,
+            StaticDelegateContractStatus::UserRevisionRequested,
         );
+        // 直接构造旧审批已写入的持久状态，验证现役 barrier 的读取行为。
         write_static_delegate_delivery_at(&root, &first).expect("write first delivery");
-        mark_static_delegate_delivery_user_revision_requested_at(
-            &root,
-            GAME_CREATOR_PROJECT_SUPERVISOR_AGENT_ID,
-            parent_run_id,
-            &first.delegation_id,
-        )
-        .expect("mark first delivery for user revision");
 
         let first_barrier = static_delegate_completion_barrier_at(
             &root,
@@ -3362,13 +3311,13 @@ mod tests {
             "the previous revision is satisfied once its continuation is claimed"
         );
 
-        mark_static_delegate_delivery_user_revision_requested_at(
-            &root,
-            GAME_CREATOR_PROJECT_SUPERVISOR_AGENT_ID,
-            parent_run_id,
-            &continuation.delegation_id,
-        )
-        .expect("mark a repair-node delivery for the second revision");
+        continuation
+            .structured_result
+            .as_mut()
+            .expect("continuation structured result")
+            .contract_status = StaticDelegateContractStatus::UserRevisionRequested;
+        write_static_delegate_delivery_at(&root, &continuation)
+            .expect("write repair-node delivery awaiting a second revision");
         let second_barrier = static_delegate_completion_barrier_at(
             &root,
             GAME_CREATOR_PROJECT_SUPERVISOR_AGENT_ID,